https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282924 Mandatory public notice requirements must be strictly complied with where they are designed to protect affected persons' right to object. Publication only through newspapers used a single prescribed mode and therefore did not satisfy Section 44 of the Delhi Development Act, 1957; the notice was invalid and the action founded on it could not stand. The record also did not show that belated objections to the proposed Master Plan modification were considered by the competent authority, although no enforceable right existed to insist on consideration of objections filed after expiry of the prescribed period. en-us Thu, 15 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:45:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282924 Mandatory public notice requirements must be strictly complied with where they are designed to protect affected persons' right to object. Publication only through newspapers used a single prescribed mode and therefore did not satisfy Section 44 of the Delhi Development Act, 1957; the notice was invalid and the action founded on it could not stand. The record also did not show that belated objections to the proposed Master Plan modification were considered by the competent authority, although no enforceable right existed to insist on consideration of objections filed after expiry of the prescribed period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282924