<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 419 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282924</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and invalidated the public notice issued by the Delhi Development Authority proposing modifications to the Master Plan for Delhi. The Court emphasized the importance of properly considering objections filed within the prescribed period to prevent prejudice to appellants, highlighting the mandatory nature of compliance with statutory provisions for public notices to protect the rights of affected parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 419 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282924</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and invalidated the public notice issued by the Delhi Development Authority proposing modifications to the Master Plan for Delhi. The Court emphasized the importance of properly considering objections filed within the prescribed period to prevent prejudice to appellants, highlighting the mandatory nature of compliance with statutory provisions for public notices to protect the rights of affected parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>