<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CIT&#039;s use of Section 263 overruled; ITAT order upheld due to pending appeal u/s 250.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49026</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - non consideration of the provisions of Section 40(a)(i-a) in respect of land development expenses - the CIT had proceeded to remand the matter back to the AO while the appeal of the assessee was pending u/s 250 and the power of exercise u/s 263 was barred by Clause (c) to Explanation 1 of Section 263 - no interference in the order of the ITAT called far</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:02:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:02:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CIT&#039;s use of Section 263 overruled; ITAT order upheld due to pending appeal u/s 250.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49026</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - non consideration of the provisions of Section 40(a)(i-a) in respect of land development expenses - the CIT had proceeded to remand the matter back to the AO while the appeal of the assessee was pending u/s 250 and the power of exercise u/s 263 was barred by Clause (c) to Explanation 1 of Section 263 - no interference in the order of the ITAT called far</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:02:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>