<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1413 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the transactions did not constitute loans or deposits under Section 269SS. Penalties under Section 271D were deemed unjustified as the same amount could not be treated as both income and a loan. The Tribunal directed deletion of penalties, allowing all appeals and rendering stay applications moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1413 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the transactions did not constitute loans or deposits under Section 269SS. Penalties under Section 271D were deemed unjustified as the same amount could not be treated as both income and a loan. The Tribunal directed deletion of penalties, allowing all appeals and rendering stay applications moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>