<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1389 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385200</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to reconsider the rejection of the request for discharge of contaminated Naphtha oil/ Slop oil/Sludge oil in light of subsequent developments and ordered a fresh decision within 10 days. The court emphasized prompt resolution, allowed both parties to present their arguments, and did not make a decision on the conflicting claims, leaving it to the respondents. The case was concluded without costs, instructing compliance with the court&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:00:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1389 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385200</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to reconsider the rejection of the request for discharge of contaminated Naphtha oil/ Slop oil/Sludge oil in light of subsequent developments and ordered a fresh decision within 10 days. The court emphasized prompt resolution, allowed both parties to present their arguments, and did not make a decision on the conflicting claims, leaving it to the respondents. The case was concluded without costs, instructing compliance with the court&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>