<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1385 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385196</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed that the show cause notice was issued within the stipulated 90-day period, considering it dispatched when put in proper form, not just signed. The appellant&#039;s alteration of the Bill of Lading date to avoid BIS certificate requirements was upheld as forgery, supported by admissions and evidence. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the notice&#039;s timely issuance and the forgery committed by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1385 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385196</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed that the show cause notice was issued within the stipulated 90-day period, considering it dispatched when put in proper form, not just signed. The appellant&#039;s alteration of the Bill of Lading date to avoid BIS certificate requirements was upheld as forgery, supported by admissions and evidence. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the notice&#039;s timely issuance and the forgery committed by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>