https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385193 The appeals were abated by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI due to the failure to file necessary applications for the continuation of proceedings in compliance with Rule 22 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Despite insolvency proceedings being initiated and a resolution professional appointed, no formal applications were submitted within the required timeframe. The tribunal emphasized the importance of timely filing and compliance with procedural rules, ultimately leading to the abatement of the appeals in this case. en-us Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 12:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385193 The appeals were abated by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI due to the failure to file necessary applications for the continuation of proceedings in compliance with Rule 22 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Despite insolvency proceedings being initiated and a resolution professional appointed, no formal applications were submitted within the required timeframe. The tribunal emphasized the importance of timely filing and compliance with procedural rules, ultimately leading to the abatement of the appeals in this case. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385193