https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19551 Objections to a recovery notice had to be decided before coercive recovery could continue, and interim protection was warranted until that consideration. The High Court directed the respondent to decide the petitioner-firm's objections within one month after production of the order and objections, and stayed recovery proceedings against the petitioner-firm in the meantime. Liberty was reserved to proceed against Ram Saran Das, and the stay would lapse if the petitioner did not take the required steps. en-us Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:22:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19551 Objections to a recovery notice had to be decided before coercive recovery could continue, and interim protection was warranted until that consideration. The High Court directed the respondent to decide the petitioner-firm's objections within one month after production of the order and objections, and stayed recovery proceedings against the petitioner-firm in the meantime. Liberty was reserved to proceed against Ram Saran Das, and the stay would lapse if the petitioner did not take the required steps. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19551