<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1376 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the equivalent penalty of Rs. 45,69,370 imposed under section 78 by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the order dated 16-02-2018. The Tribunal found no reason to impose a penalty under section 78 when the appellant had paid the penalty under section 76 and complied with the same. Additionally, the transitory provision under section 78(B)(1)(b) clarified the applicability of sections 76 and 78 based on the circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1376 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the equivalent penalty of Rs. 45,69,370 imposed under section 78 by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the order dated 16-02-2018. The Tribunal found no reason to impose a penalty under section 78 when the appellant had paid the penalty under section 76 and complied with the same. Additionally, the transitory provision under section 78(B)(1)(b) clarified the applicability of sections 76 and 78 based on the circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>