<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1375 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385186</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 requires evidence of suppression of facts or intent to evade tax; mere non-registration, non-filing of returns or non-payment was held insufficient, so the equivalent penalty was set aside. Where the commission received was shown to be inclusive of service tax, the tax liability had to be computed on a cum-tax basis, and denial of that benefit was set aside. The remaining service tax liability and interest were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1375 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385186</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 requires evidence of suppression of facts or intent to evade tax; mere non-registration, non-filing of returns or non-payment was held insufficient, so the equivalent penalty was set aside. Where the commission received was shown to be inclusive of service tax, the tax liability had to be computed on a cum-tax basis, and denial of that benefit was set aside. The remaining service tax liability and interest were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>