<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1373 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, confirming the recovery of service tax amounts, imposition of interest, and penalties for contravention of tax provisions. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Department provided sufficient evidence of substantial falsity in the VCES declaration and lack of evidence for sales receipts, emphasizing the significance of accurate declarations and supporting evidence in tax compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:59:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1373 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, confirming the recovery of service tax amounts, imposition of interest, and penalties for contravention of tax provisions. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Department provided sufficient evidence of substantial falsity in the VCES declaration and lack of evidence for sales receipts, emphasizing the significance of accurate declarations and supporting evidence in tax compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>