<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 99 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19550</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the classification of the product as raw material or a finished product determines its eligibility for development rebate under item No. 1 or item No. 11 of the Fifth Schedule. The court emphasized that the rebate is permissible if the product retains the character of iron and steel or is an article made of iron and steel. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 99 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19550</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the classification of the product as raw material or a finished product determines its eligibility for development rebate under item No. 1 or item No. 11 of the Fifth Schedule. The court emphasized that the rebate is permissible if the product retains the character of iron and steel or is an article made of iron and steel. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>