https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385177 The High Court set aside the CESTAT's judgment and remanded the appeals for fresh evaluation, directing expeditious disposal within six months. Appeals by the Commissioner were allowed, while those by the Assessees were dismissed, with no order as to costs. The court found the CESTAT's grounds for remand insufficient, upheld the retention of the pre-deposit amount, supported the pre-deposit order under Section 129E, and agreed with observations on the Assessees' conduct. en-us Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jan 2020 11:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385177 The High Court set aside the CESTAT's judgment and remanded the appeals for fresh evaluation, directing expeditious disposal within six months. Appeals by the Commissioner were allowed, while those by the Assessees were dismissed, with no order as to costs. The court found the CESTAT's grounds for remand insufficient, upheld the retention of the pre-deposit amount, supported the pre-deposit order under Section 129E, and agreed with observations on the Assessees' conduct. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385177