https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385176 The Bombay High Court allowed appeals challenging the reduction of penalty amount by CESTAT. The court found that CESTAT failed to address the crucial jurisdictional issue of limitation, leading to the setting aside of the judgment. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication within six months, emphasizing the importance of considering jurisdictional issues in excise cases and ensuring procedural fairness. The High Court highlighted the significance of addressing all relevant aspects and the need for legal compliance in excise matters. en-us Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385176 The Bombay High Court allowed appeals challenging the reduction of penalty amount by CESTAT. The court found that CESTAT failed to address the crucial jurisdictional issue of limitation, leading to the setting aside of the judgment. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication within six months, emphasizing the importance of considering jurisdictional issues in excise cases and ensuring procedural fairness. The High Court highlighted the significance of addressing all relevant aspects and the need for legal compliance in excise matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385176