<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1362 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385173</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the orders of the first respondent. The court found no infirmity in the levy of interest on the tax for the sale of REP licenses and the additional sales tax, validating the actions taken by the tax authorities post the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment. The court emphasized that the liability to pay tax and interest was consistent with the established legal position and the amendments to the relevant tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1362 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385173</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the orders of the first respondent. The court found no infirmity in the levy of interest on the tax for the sale of REP licenses and the additional sales tax, validating the actions taken by the tax authorities post the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment. The court emphasized that the liability to pay tax and interest was consistent with the established legal position and the amendments to the relevant tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>