<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1359 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385170</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the revision petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the lower courts&#039; decisions was dismissed as the evidence supported the complainant&#039;s claims, and the presumption under Section 139 of the Act was not rebutted. The court granted a three-month period for the petitioner to pay the fine imposed, affirming the conviction and sentence without modification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 07:53:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1359 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385170</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the revision petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the lower courts&#039; decisions was dismissed as the evidence supported the complainant&#039;s claims, and the presumption under Section 139 of the Act was not rebutted. The court granted a three-month period for the petitioner to pay the fine imposed, affirming the conviction and sentence without modification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>