https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385169 The High Court ruled that Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act should have a prospective application and does not apply to cases where the offense occurred before its enactment. The court set aside the trial court's order directing interim compensation and the revisional order, stating that the respondent was not entitled to the benefit of a previous decision. This judgment clarified that Section 143-A applies to cases where the offense under Section 138 of the Act was committed after the provision's introduction. en-us Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Sep 2019 10:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385169 The High Court ruled that Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act should have a prospective application and does not apply to cases where the offense occurred before its enactment. The court set aside the trial court's order directing interim compensation and the revisional order, stating that the respondent was not entitled to the benefit of a previous decision. This judgment clarified that Section 143-A applies to cases where the offense under Section 138 of the Act was committed after the provision's introduction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385169