https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282921 An appealable GST order under Section 129 of the Kerala State GST Act should ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appeal remedy, and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not to be invoked where that effective remedy is available and no special circumstance is shown. The High Court therefore declined to examine the merits, dismissed the writ petition, and left the petitioner free to pursue the appeal. It also preserved the petitioner's contentions against the order and granted limited interim protection against encashment of the bank guarantee to enable filing of the appeal. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282921 An appealable GST order under Section 129 of the Kerala State GST Act should ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appeal remedy, and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not to be invoked where that effective remedy is available and no special circumstance is shown. The High Court therefore declined to examine the merits, dismissed the writ petition, and left the petitioner free to pursue the appeal. It also preserved the petitioner's contentions against the order and granted limited interim protection against encashment of the bank guarantee to enable filing of the appeal. Case-Laws GST Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282921