<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1389 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282921</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging Ext.P5 order under the KSGST Act, clarifying it did not express a view on the merits raised by the petitioner. The Court granted a two-week stay on the encashment of the Bank Guarantee to allow the petitioner to file an appeal and seek a stay on Ext.P5. The appellate authority was directed to address any stay applications within this period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 07:49:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1389 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282921</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging Ext.P5 order under the KSGST Act, clarifying it did not express a view on the merits raised by the petitioner. The Court granted a two-week stay on the encashment of the Bank Guarantee to allow the petitioner to file an appeal and seek a stay on Ext.P5. The appellate authority was directed to address any stay applications within this period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>