https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282914 The appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 30.12.2015 was abated due to the appointment of the Official Liquidator and the appellant's failure to comply with Rule 22 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The Tribunal held that the lack of action by the appellant following the appointment of the Official Liquidator led to the abatement of the appeals. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural rules, particularly in cases involving liquidation proceedings, and underscores the consequences of non-compliance, highlighting the need for timely and appropriate actions in accordance with the established rules and procedures. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 07:41:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282914 The appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 30.12.2015 was abated due to the appointment of the Official Liquidator and the appellant's failure to comply with Rule 22 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The Tribunal held that the lack of action by the appellant following the appointment of the Official Liquidator led to the abatement of the appeals. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural rules, particularly in cases involving liquidation proceedings, and underscores the consequences of non-compliance, highlighting the need for timely and appropriate actions in accordance with the established rules and procedures. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282914