<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1695 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, permitting deductions for broken period interest, ex-gratia payments, and prior period expenses. However, it upheld the treatment of the refund of municipal tax receipt as income. The decision on the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not explicitly detailed in the summary provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 07:41:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1695 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, permitting deductions for broken period interest, ex-gratia payments, and prior period expenses. However, it upheld the treatment of the refund of municipal tax receipt as income. The decision on the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not explicitly detailed in the summary provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>