<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 600 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282908</link>
    <description>Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 requires unquoted equity shares to be valued by the prescribed break-up method where it applies, and not by the yield method. The Gujarat High Court stated that the Tribunal&#039;s direction to adopt the yield method was inconsistent with the governing valuation rule. The reference was therefore answered against the assessee and in favour of the revenue on the valuation method for gifted unquoted equity shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:02:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 600 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282908</link>
      <description>Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 requires unquoted equity shares to be valued by the prescribed break-up method where it applies, and not by the yield method. The Gujarat High Court stated that the Tribunal&#039;s direction to adopt the yield method was inconsistent with the governing valuation rule. The reference was therefore answered against the assessee and in favour of the revenue on the valuation method for gifted unquoted equity shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>