<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1352 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385163</link>
    <description>Facilitating deposit works for modification, augmentation, shifting or addition to a transmission system at the request of a consumer or intending agency was treated as a taxable supply of services because it involved services rendered for consideration in the course or furtherance of business. The value of supply was held to include amounts directly incurred by the consumer or intending agency for the infrastructure, since that expenditure formed part of the consideration where the work was done under the supplier&#039;s supervision or by the supplier itself. The arrangement was classified under the relevant service entry and GST was applied at 18%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1352 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385163</link>
      <description>Facilitating deposit works for modification, augmentation, shifting or addition to a transmission system at the request of a consumer or intending agency was treated as a taxable supply of services because it involved services rendered for consideration in the course or furtherance of business. The value of supply was held to include amounts directly incurred by the consumer or intending agency for the infrastructure, since that expenditure formed part of the consideration where the work was done under the supplier&#039;s supervision or by the supplier itself. The arrangement was classified under the relevant service entry and GST was applied at 18%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>