<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 41 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19542</link>
    <description>Where an assessment denying exemption was carried in appeal and the appellate authority directed allowance of exemption under section 11, the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order implementing that direction ceased to have an independent existence. The doctrine of merger applied, so the assessment order was absorbed into the appellate order and was not a separate subsisting order capable of revision under section 263. Any attempt to revise it would, in substance, amount to revising the appellate order itself, which was impermissible. The Commissioner therefore lacked jurisdiction to interfere, and the revision was without authority of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:03:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 41 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19542</link>
      <description>Where an assessment denying exemption was carried in appeal and the appellate authority directed allowance of exemption under section 11, the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order implementing that direction ceased to have an independent existence. The doctrine of merger applied, so the assessment order was absorbed into the appellate order and was not a separate subsisting order capable of revision under section 263. Any attempt to revise it would, in substance, amount to revising the appellate order itself, which was impermissible. The Commissioner therefore lacked jurisdiction to interfere, and the revision was without authority of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>