https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385158 The court dismissed the Tax Appeal as the substantial questions of law raised by the Revenue regarding expenses on consumption and replacement of stores and spares, contribution/donation to educational institutions, trust, local bodies, and commission payment to dealers were deemed non-debatable. Previous court decisions, including the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer and Chemicals Ltd., were relied upon to conclusively settle these issues, highlighting a consistent legal interpretation and application of the law. en-us Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385158 The court dismissed the Tax Appeal as the substantial questions of law raised by the Revenue regarding expenses on consumption and replacement of stores and spares, contribution/donation to educational institutions, trust, local bodies, and commission payment to dealers were deemed non-debatable. Previous court decisions, including the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer and Chemicals Ltd., were relied upon to conclusively settle these issues, highlighting a consistent legal interpretation and application of the law. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385158