<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1337 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385148</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen the assessment for a specific year was quashed as it was based on a mere change of opinion, which is impermissible. The court emphasized that reassessment should be grounded on tangible material indicating income escapement and not on a mere change of opinion. The petition challenging the notice was allowed, and the impugned notice was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1337 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385148</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen the assessment for a specific year was quashed as it was based on a mere change of opinion, which is impermissible. The court emphasized that reassessment should be grounded on tangible material indicating income escapement and not on a mere change of opinion. The petition challenging the notice was allowed, and the impugned notice was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>