<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1325 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385136</link>
    <description>Software licence renewal payments to a resident were treated as royalty; the retrospective clarification to section 9(1)(vi) was applied, so tax was required to be withheld under section 194J and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) followed. Foreign tax credit was held available only for income actually doubly taxed, and its quantum under the MAT regime could not exceed the tax attributable to that income. For section 14A, interest disallowance was deleted where own funds exceeded investments, while administrative disallowance was to be recomputed only on investments yielding exempt income. The Tribunal also held that lapsed ESOP amounts were not includible in book profits under section 115JB, that section 10A turnover adjustments must be made consistently, and that EURIBOR could be used for benchmarking AE interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1325 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385136</link>
      <description>Software licence renewal payments to a resident were treated as royalty; the retrospective clarification to section 9(1)(vi) was applied, so tax was required to be withheld under section 194J and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) followed. Foreign tax credit was held available only for income actually doubly taxed, and its quantum under the MAT regime could not exceed the tax attributable to that income. For section 14A, interest disallowance was deleted where own funds exceeded investments, while administrative disallowance was to be recomputed only on investments yielding exempt income. The Tribunal also held that lapsed ESOP amounts were not includible in book profits under section 115JB, that section 10A turnover adjustments must be made consistently, and that EURIBOR could be used for benchmarking AE interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>