<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1314 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385125</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal of the assessee by directing the AO to apply a net profit rate of 5% on the cash deposits of Rs. 8,70,000, resulting in no additional income beyond the returned income. The ITAT found the addition made by the AO unjustified and dismissed the remaining grounds as not pressed. The CIT(A)&#039;s direction for penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not specifically addressed, but the overall decision favored the assessee on substantive grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1314 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385125</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal of the assessee by directing the AO to apply a net profit rate of 5% on the cash deposits of Rs. 8,70,000, resulting in no additional income beyond the returned income. The ITAT found the addition made by the AO unjustified and dismissed the remaining grounds as not pressed. The CIT(A)&#039;s direction for penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not specifically addressed, but the overall decision favored the assessee on substantive grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>