<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1307 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385118</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted permission to file an appeal and issued interim directions for the payment of a matured F &amp;amp; O Segment contract. The National Security Clearing Corporation Limited was directed to honor the contract without prejudice to the parties&#039; rights. Certain entities were allowed to convert/sell/encash mutual funds provided as security, with the realized amount to be deposited in a fixed deposit. The Court mandated the deposit in the name of IL &amp;amp; FS Securities Services Limited for six months, pending further orders. Jurisdiction issues involving regulatory bodies and interpretation of bye-laws were left open for final hearing and clarification after four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1307 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385118</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted permission to file an appeal and issued interim directions for the payment of a matured F &amp;amp; O Segment contract. The National Security Clearing Corporation Limited was directed to honor the contract without prejudice to the parties&#039; rights. Certain entities were allowed to convert/sell/encash mutual funds provided as security, with the realized amount to be deposited in a fixed deposit. The Court mandated the deposit in the name of IL &amp;amp; FS Securities Services Limited for six months, pending further orders. Jurisdiction issues involving regulatory bodies and interpretation of bye-laws were left open for final hearing and clarification after four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>