<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1297 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385108</link>
    <description>A Tribunal order founded on an earlier decision that had already been recalled could not be sustained, because an adjudication based on a non-existent basis is legally vitiated. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the impugned order and remanded the matters to the Tribunal for fresh disposal on merits, with all issues kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:16:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1297 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385108</link>
      <description>A Tribunal order founded on an earlier decision that had already been recalled could not be sustained, because an adjudication based on a non-existent basis is legally vitiated. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the impugned order and remanded the matters to the Tribunal for fresh disposal on merits, with all issues kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>