<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1295 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order confirming the duty demand, dismissing the appeal based on sufficient corroborative evidence, voluntary admissions, intentional evasion, and valid jurisdiction of the show cause notice. The case law cited by the appellant was deemed inapplicable, and the Order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1295 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order confirming the duty demand, dismissing the appeal based on sufficient corroborative evidence, voluntary admissions, intentional evasion, and valid jurisdiction of the show cause notice. The case law cited by the appellant was deemed inapplicable, and the Order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>