https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282898 A lease clause requiring construction within three years permitted extension only in exceptional circumstances and on conditions imposed by the lessor, so the allottee had no enforceable right to extension at the original premium-based rate. The percentage reference in the lease fixed only the quantum framework and did not exclude the authority's power to prescribe revised uniform extension charges. Because the revised policy was applied uniformly to similarly situated allottees and no discrimination or arbitrariness was shown, the revised demand was upheld. No exceptional circumstance justified a mandatory extension, and the contract could not be rewritten by the court. en-us Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:23:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282898 A lease clause requiring construction within three years permitted extension only in exceptional circumstances and on conditions imposed by the lessor, so the allottee had no enforceable right to extension at the original premium-based rate. The percentage reference in the lease fixed only the quantum framework and did not exclude the authority's power to prescribe revised uniform extension charges. Because the revised policy was applied uniformly to similarly situated allottees and no discrimination or arbitrariness was shown, the revised demand was upheld. No exceptional circumstance justified a mandatory extension, and the contract could not be rewritten by the court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282898