<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 717 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282887</link>
    <description>Appointment obtained on the basis of a false caste certificate was treated as void in law, so the employee could not claim Article 311 protection or insist on a further disciplinary inquiry; the verification process was held sufficient and removal from service was upheld. For the son, whose admission and examination benefit also flowed from the cancelled caste status, the Court allowed a limited equitable exception because the course had already been completed under interim orders and no useful purpose would be served by withholding the result. Results and degree were permitted, but only without any future Scheduled Caste benefit, and he was to be treated as belonging to the general category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:50:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 717 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282887</link>
      <description>Appointment obtained on the basis of a false caste certificate was treated as void in law, so the employee could not claim Article 311 protection or insist on a further disciplinary inquiry; the verification process was held sufficient and removal from service was upheld. For the son, whose admission and examination benefit also flowed from the cancelled caste status, the Court allowed a limited equitable exception because the course had already been completed under interim orders and no useful purpose would be served by withholding the result. Results and degree were permitted, but only without any future Scheduled Caste benefit, and he was to be treated as belonging to the general category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>