<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1276 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385087</link>
    <description>A bail application in a GST prosecution was rejected where the accused was alleged to have acted as an accountant, issued false bills without actual supply of goods, and facilitated bogus input tax credit and tax evasion. The Court treated the allegations as serious, relied on the continuing investigation and the accused&#039;s statement admitting his role in issuing bills for bogus firms, and held that the material did not justify release on bail at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1276 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385087</link>
      <description>A bail application in a GST prosecution was rejected where the accused was alleged to have acted as an accountant, issued false bills without actual supply of goods, and facilitated bogus input tax credit and tax evasion. The Court treated the allegations as serious, relied on the continuing investigation and the accused&#039;s statement admitting his role in issuing bills for bogus firms, and held that the material did not justify release on bail at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>