<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1274 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385085</link>
    <description>An appellate tribunal cannot dismiss a statutory tax appeal solely for non-appearance or want of prosecution; it must adjudicate the appeal on merits and address the substantive controversy even if the appellant is absent. Applying that settled principle, the Madras HC held that dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeals in limine for default was unsustainable. The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were restored to the Tribunal for fresh decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1274 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385085</link>
      <description>An appellate tribunal cannot dismiss a statutory tax appeal solely for non-appearance or want of prosecution; it must adjudicate the appeal on merits and address the substantive controversy even if the appellant is absent. Applying that settled principle, the Madras HC held that dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeals in limine for default was unsustainable. The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were restored to the Tribunal for fresh decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>