https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385077 The Tribunal held that the proceedings under Section 263 were time-barred and the reassessment order dated 09.02.2016 was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue. It was found that the AO exceeded jurisdiction by making additions unrelated to the reasons for reopening. The appeal was allowed, and the order dated 22.03.2018 was quashed. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385077 The Tribunal held that the proceedings under Section 263 were time-barred and the reassessment order dated 09.02.2016 was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue. It was found that the AO exceeded jurisdiction by making additions unrelated to the reasons for reopening. The appeal was allowed, and the order dated 22.03.2018 was quashed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385077