<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Denies Tax Loss Claim: Same Premises for Buyer and Seller Not Justified as &quot;Ease of Business.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48980</link>
    <description>Bogus loss - when ultimate buyer and the seller operate from the same premises, why is the assessee roped in every time, and every time that happens, assessee incurs a loss - the “ease of business” for every connected party operating from the same premises is too vague an explanation to merit judicial approval - loss not allowable</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:32:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:32:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Denies Tax Loss Claim: Same Premises for Buyer and Seller Not Justified as &quot;Ease of Business.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48980</link>
      <description>Bogus loss - when ultimate buyer and the seller operate from the same premises, why is the assessee roped in every time, and every time that happens, assessee incurs a loss - the “ease of business” for every connected party operating from the same premises is too vague an explanation to merit judicial approval - loss not allowable</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:32:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>