<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1255 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the condonation of a 97-day delay in filing the appeal. The confiscation of imported goods and enhancement of their value were upheld, but the redemption fine and personal penalty were reduced. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the reduction was dismissed, as the Tribunal found the precedent of a 10% redemption fine and 5% penalty appropriate for import violations, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1255 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the condonation of a 97-day delay in filing the appeal. The confiscation of imported goods and enhancement of their value were upheld, but the redemption fine and personal penalty were reduced. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the reduction was dismissed, as the Tribunal found the precedent of a 10% redemption fine and 5% penalty appropriate for import violations, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>