<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1250 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385061</link>
    <description>The High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh overturned the Appellate Deputy Commissioner&#039;s dismissal of appeals by Hyderabad Cylinders Pvt. Ltd. for non-payment of the statutory deposit within the stipulated time. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the High Court held that delays in depositing the required amount should be condoned if the appeal was filed within the limitation period. The Court directed the Appellate Deputy Commissioner to hear the appeals on their merits and dispose of them promptly. As a result, the writ petitions were allowed, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1250 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385061</link>
      <description>The High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh overturned the Appellate Deputy Commissioner&#039;s dismissal of appeals by Hyderabad Cylinders Pvt. Ltd. for non-payment of the statutory deposit within the stipulated time. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the High Court held that delays in depositing the required amount should be condoned if the appeal was filed within the limitation period. The Court directed the Appellate Deputy Commissioner to hear the appeals on their merits and dispose of them promptly. As a result, the writ petitions were allowed, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>