<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19521</link>
    <description>In Chapter XX-C property purchase proceedings, the text explains that reasonable opportunity must be given, but a short notice period may still suffice where relevant valuation material is already on record and a late request for further documents appears dilatory. It also states that valuation must be based on market value, with factors such as location, frontage, road width, size, time-gap and salvage value considered; absent perversity, non-application of mind or patent illegality, writ interference is not warranted. The text further notes that acquisition under Chapter XX-C is a public-interest anti-undervaluation mechanism and does not by itself cast stigma or slur on the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:50:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19521</link>
      <description>In Chapter XX-C property purchase proceedings, the text explains that reasonable opportunity must be given, but a short notice period may still suffice where relevant valuation material is already on record and a late request for further documents appears dilatory. It also states that valuation must be based on market value, with factors such as location, frontage, road width, size, time-gap and salvage value considered; absent perversity, non-application of mind or patent illegality, writ interference is not warranted. The text further notes that acquisition under Chapter XX-C is a public-interest anti-undervaluation mechanism and does not by itself cast stigma or slur on the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>