<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1235 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385046</link>
    <description>Delay of four days in filing the appeal was condoned, and the Miscellaneous Application was allowed. The connected appeal filed by the assessee was directed to be linked with the present appeal, and both appeals were ordered to be listed together in due course.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:09:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1235 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385046</link>
      <description>Delay of four days in filing the appeal was condoned, and the Miscellaneous Application was allowed. The connected appeal filed by the assessee was directed to be linked with the present appeal, and both appeals were ordered to be listed together in due course.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>