<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1232 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385043</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal, comprising SMT. ARCHANA WADHWA and MR. ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR, ruled on whether transportation costs recovered from customers should be included in the excisable value of the final product. Citing a previous decision, the tribunal held that such expenses are not part of the excisable value. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowed the appeal, and granted relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:07:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1232 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385043</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal, comprising SMT. ARCHANA WADHWA and MR. ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR, ruled on whether transportation costs recovered from customers should be included in the excisable value of the final product. Citing a previous decision, the tribunal held that such expenses are not part of the excisable value. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowed the appeal, and granted relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>