https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385039 Where an efficacious statutory appeal and a stay application against a penalty order were already pending, the HC held that the writ court was not obliged to examine the validity of the penalty on merits. Instead, it could confine relief to ensuring prompt consideration of the stay request by the appellate authority and defer recovery for a limited period. The court found this to be an equitable course and upheld the writ court's order, leaving the challenge to the penalty order to be pursued before the appellate forum. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:05:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385039 Where an efficacious statutory appeal and a stay application against a penalty order were already pending, the HC held that the writ court was not obliged to examine the validity of the penalty on merits. Instead, it could confine relief to ensuring prompt consideration of the stay request by the appellate authority and defer recovery for a limited period. The court found this to be an equitable course and upheld the writ court's order, leaving the challenge to the penalty order to be pursued before the appellate forum. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385039