<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1688 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, deleting certain additions such as unexplained investments, sale proceeds of jewelry, and agricultural income. However, penalties and some additions were upheld. The appeal regarding capital gains on jewelry for HUF was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1688 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, deleting certain additions such as unexplained investments, sale proceeds of jewelry, and agricultural income. However, penalties and some additions were upheld. The appeal regarding capital gains on jewelry for HUF was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>