https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282865 Where disciplinary proceedings were validly initiated and the only defect was absence of formal approval of the charge memorandum, ex post facto approval granted during the pendency of the proceedings was treated as curing that technical lapse, since no prejudice was shown. The Tribunal's quashing of the disciplinary action on the grounds of lack of approval and delay was held unsustainable because the disciplinary authority had to first consider the matter and address delay in the decision-making process. The proceedings were therefore permitted to continue in accordance with law, without any opinion on the merits of the charges. en-us Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:19:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282865 Where disciplinary proceedings were validly initiated and the only defect was absence of formal approval of the charge memorandum, ex post facto approval granted during the pendency of the proceedings was treated as curing that technical lapse, since no prejudice was shown. The Tribunal's quashing of the disciplinary action on the grounds of lack of approval and delay was held unsustainable because the disciplinary authority had to first consider the matter and address delay in the decision-making process. The proceedings were therefore permitted to continue in accordance with law, without any opinion on the merits of the charges. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282865