<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1276 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 4,75,710 and deleting the balance addition of Rs. 4,75,710 in the first issue. However, the appeal was dismissed in the second issue, confirming the addition of Rs. 20,00,000 as unexplained investment under Section 69 in the purchase agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1276 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 4,75,710 and deleting the balance addition of Rs. 4,75,710 in the first issue. However, the appeal was dismissed in the second issue, confirming the addition of Rs. 20,00,000 as unexplained investment under Section 69 in the purchase agreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>