<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1366 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282869</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the policy decision dated 06.03.2007, finding it valid and in the public interest. The decision to charge uniform prices for RLNG was deemed non-arbitrary and non-discriminatory, benefiting all long-term RLNG contracts. The Court held that the price increase resulting from the policy decision was within contractual terms and not subject to refund, as there was no evidence of unjust enrichment. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1366 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282869</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the policy decision dated 06.03.2007, finding it valid and in the public interest. The decision to charge uniform prices for RLNG was deemed non-arbitrary and non-discriminatory, benefiting all long-term RLNG contracts. The Court held that the price increase resulting from the policy decision was within contractual terms and not subject to refund, as there was no evidence of unjust enrichment. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>