<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1099 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282852</link>
    <description>The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 was upheld as constitutionally valid, with the Court relying on an earlier decision sustaining a similar depositor-protection enactment. The High Court&#039;s view striking down the Act was found unsustainable, and its judgment was set aside. The Court confined itself to the constitutional validity challenge and did not address other issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:02:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1099 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282852</link>
      <description>The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 was upheld as constitutionally valid, with the Court relying on an earlier decision sustaining a similar depositor-protection enactment. The High Court&#039;s view striking down the Act was found unsustainable, and its judgment was set aside. The Court confined itself to the constitutional validity challenge and did not address other issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>