<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1204 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385015</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application seeking modification of expired stay orders, deeming it infructuous as the orders had lapsed. The Tribunal clarified that the fresh stay application by the assessee would be considered independently, with both parties presenting arguments. The decision on the fresh stay application would be based on the parties&#039; contentions, separate from the dismissed application by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1204 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385015</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application seeking modification of expired stay orders, deeming it infructuous as the orders had lapsed. The Tribunal clarified that the fresh stay application by the assessee would be considered independently, with both parties presenting arguments. The decision on the fresh stay application would be based on the parties&#039; contentions, separate from the dismissed application by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>