<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1196 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty on the cash payment towards the purchase of a villa as it did not qualify as &#039;undisclosed income&#039; under section 271AAB. However, the penalty on the cash found during the search was sustained as the source was inadequately explained. The Tribunal stressed the need for a strict interpretation of penalty provisions and clear identification of &#039;undisclosed income&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1196 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty on the cash payment towards the purchase of a villa as it did not qualify as &#039;undisclosed income&#039; under section 271AAB. However, the penalty on the cash found during the search was sustained as the source was inadequately explained. The Tribunal stressed the need for a strict interpretation of penalty provisions and clear identification of &#039;undisclosed income&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>