<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1191 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385002</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 16,00,000/- was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal found the tax authorities&#039; insistence on a written agreement and the suspicion of funds being used elsewhere to be unsupported by evidence. The judgment emphasized the need to consider the peculiar circumstances of each case when evaluating the reasonableness of explanations for cash transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1191 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385002</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 16,00,000/- was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal found the tax authorities&#039; insistence on a written agreement and the suspicion of funds being used elsewhere to be unsupported by evidence. The judgment emphasized the need to consider the peculiar circumstances of each case when evaluating the reasonableness of explanations for cash transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>