<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1187 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384998</link>
    <description>The case involved an exporter seeking a refund of service tax paid under Notification No. 41/2012-ST for services used in exporting goods. The court upheld the rejection of a refund claim of Rs. 25,87,200 due to late filing beyond the specified time limit. The decision emphasized strict compliance with the notification&#039;s conditions. However, the court allowed a refund of Rs. 3,01,365 as the appellant provided evidence of full realization of sale proceeds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1187 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384998</link>
      <description>The case involved an exporter seeking a refund of service tax paid under Notification No. 41/2012-ST for services used in exporting goods. The court upheld the rejection of a refund claim of Rs. 25,87,200 due to late filing beyond the specified time limit. The decision emphasized strict compliance with the notification&#039;s conditions. However, the court allowed a refund of Rs. 3,01,365 as the appellant provided evidence of full realization of sale proceeds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>